http://www.sentimentrader.com/subscriber/daily_comment.php

 

September 16, 2007

12:30 PM EST

 

Why a Fed Ease Might Not Mean What You Think

 

The most talked- and written-about event in recent memory is the upcoming FOMC meeting.  On Tuesday, the Federal Reserve will announce whether they plan on making a change to their short-term interest rate target.

 

I am neither an economist nor Fed theorist, so I will not bore you with my take on what they should do.  Based on historical movements between current short-term market rates and Fed target rates, it's clear that we should expect a cut on Tuesday, but we have a new Fed Chairman and I have no idea what he actually will (or won't) do.

 

Instead, I want to take a look at historical cuts in rates, as that may provide a useful primer on what we could expect to see going forward.  Even more important, I want to counter some prevailing wisdom that I've read and heard.

 

There seems to be no question that when the Fed cuts rates, stocks will rise, the U.S. Dollar will fall and gold will rise.  There is so much consensus on that opinion that it seems a foregone conclusion.

 

The idea that stocks will rise I can understand - that argument has solid historical precedent as we will see.  But the other two I don't get, as it flies in the face of history.  Surely, the current situation is different from others over the past 30 years, but it isn't just interest rate differentials that drive currency movements, and we should go into next week with a clear view of history.

 

Below, I show each of the eight instances since 1971 when the Fed lowered the discount rate after a period of raising them, or going more than a year with no changes.

 

I used the discount rate as opposed to the federal funds rate because until recently, the discount rate was a primary tool of the Fed, and their historical data is much more precise than it is with the federal funds rate.

 

Not only that, but the two rates have moved pretty much in lockstep and we don't lose much in translation.  Also, the Fed already lowered the discount rate last month, so these historical precedents are currently in effect.  In some instances, the Fed data is somewhat ambiguous, with no actual date given of the Fed action, so we had to make an educated guess as to the precise date of their change.

 

For each occurrence of the Fed easing, we'll see a chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the US Dollar Index, Gold and the CRB Commodities Index.

 

The gray dotted vertical line highlights the date that the Fed eased the discount rate.  The blue dotted lines show the general trend in each asset class from the date of the easing until one year later.  Following each chart is a table that shows the return in each class one year later, along with the maximum gain and maximum loss each encountered during the year.

 

Let's get to it:

 

December 6, 1974

 

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA +41.8% +52.7% N/A
US Dollar Index +4.0% +4.7% -4.2%
Gold -21.1% +4.6% -26.4%
CRB Index -12.4% N/A -19.9%

 

 

 

 

 

May 28, 1980

 

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA +15.6% +19.0% -1.9%
US Dollar Index +12.5% +13.0% -1.8%
Gold -9.0% +35.0% -12.4%
CRB Index +12.0% +29.7% N/A

 

 

 

 

 

October 30, 1981

 

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA +16.3% +21.6% -8.9%
US Dollar Index +14.1% +14.1% -3.8%
Gold -0.9% +12.7% -30.5%
CRB Index -14.5% N/A -15.3%

 

 

 

 

 

November 21, 1984

 

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA +21.7% +21.7% -3.2%
US Dollar Index -9.1% +10.4% -9.1%
Gold -4.0% +0.2% -16.5%
CRB Index -11.4% N/A -13.8%

 

 

 

 

 

December 19, 1990

 

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA +10.7% +17.2% -5.9%
US Dollar Index +1.2% +10.1% -2.6%
Gold -5.1% +6.4% -9.2%
CRB Index -4.7% N/A -6.9%

 

 

 

 

January 31, 1996

 

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA +25.2% +27.6% -0.9%
US Dollar Index +4.9% +4.9% -1.7%
Gold -15.1% +2.3% -15.1%
CRB Index -3.2% +3.5% -3.9%

 

 

 

 

October 15, 1998

 

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA +27.0% +36.5% N/A
US Dollar Index -0.2% +6.4% -0.9%
Gold +4.6% +9.2% -15.2%
CRB Index +0.9% +0.9% -10.0%

 

 

 

 

January 3, 2001

 

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA -7.8% +3.6% -24.8%
US Dollar Index +8.3% +8.6% N/A
Gold +7.4% +9.8% -4.2%
CRB Index -16.3% N/A -18.5%

 

 

From the charts and performance tables, it's pretty clear what the general trends were.  To further the point, the following table shows the average returns and average maximum gains/losses in each category over all the instances:

 

 

1-Year

Return

Max

Gain

Max

Loss

DJIA +18.8% +25.0% -5.7%
US Dollar Index +4.5% +9.0% -3.0%
Gold -5.4% +10.0% -16.2%
CRB Index -6.2% +4.3% -11.0%

 

 

Conclusion:  Fed Ease Good for Stocks, Dollar; Bad for Gold, Commodities

 

While it's always dangerous to make gross generalizations based on history, ignoring that same history is even more dangerous.  From the precedents that we have of prior Fed easings after a prolonged period of not doing so, four themes are clear.

 

Fed easings have been:

 

1.  Good for stocks

2.  Good for the US Dollar

3.  Bad for gold

4.  Bad for commodities

 

Long-term Treasury Bonds had a very mixed record.  Half the time they went up, half the time they went down, and there was no clear bias either way.

 

The idea that a cut in short-term interest rates might be good for the Dollar and bad for gold is absolute heresy, at least if one reads or listens to the financial media.  And maybe that will be the case this time, too.  But instead of relying on opinion, it's a good thing to check our history first, and that exercise tells us that making such a snap judgment might not be the brightest of ideas.

 

All the best,

 

Jason Goepfert

President and CEO

Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

 

Forwarding or otherwise distributing this copyrighted material is a breach of your subscriber agreement.  Violators are subject to termination of their subscription with any received subscription fees forfeited.  Any references to historical performance are based on data we deem to be reliable, but are based upon feeds from third parties.  We do not recommend subscribers take positions based on data presented here alone, but rather incorporate it into a comprehensive investment outlook.


© 2007 Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.