|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will turn 25% Bearish if the S&P 500 closes
below 1128.
Why:
In March,
we discussed
a large number of reasons to expect an imminent rally of one
to three months' duration, or perhaps even more. The
rally exceeded all kinds of expectations, and on an
intermediate-term time frame we haven't seen too many
reasons to expect an imminent end. Now we have the
Dumb Money Confidence at 75%, and the Smart/Dumb Spread at
-38%. Every time we've seen this kind of extreme in
the past 15 years, any further short-term strength (over 2-4
weeks) was reversed longer-term (over 1-3 months). We
expect the same this time around, so it's just a matter of
waiting to see if and when price action starts to crack.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Smart/Dumb Confidence is bearish.
Rrising 200-day avg;
higher highs/higher lows. Sup / Res:
Other:
Trading near new highs. Seasonality is modestly
negative.
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
Intel Earnings
Other than a disturbing spike in the ratio of
Nasdaq to NYSE Volume, there aren't really any extremes that differ
from what we've already covered over the past week or so. It's also pretty
evident that traders are focused on one major event, and that's Intel's
earnings. JP Morgan is a focus as well, but their importance as a
bellwether has waxed and waned over the years. Intel, however, has
been a focal point for many years. After jumping 3%
after its release yesterday afternoon, Intel has settled back to nearly
unchanged as I write. Earlier this morning it was still indicated
to open higher, yet the Nasdaq 100 futures were gapping lower.
That would have been only the 5th time that's happened since 1999, out
of 27 occurrences. With Intel
looking to open around unchanged, let's just look at how the market has
responded when Intel reports (either bad or good numbers, it doesn't
matter) while the Nasdaq 100 was sitting near a 52-week high at the
time. We're using the QQQQ exchange-traded fund here.
QQQQ Performance When Intel
Reports And QQQQ Is Within 2%
Of A 1-Year High
Date Two
Weeks Later Max Loss Max Gain
The results were weak over the next couple of weeks, with 12
out of 14 instances sporting a negative return. The
average maximum loss during those two-week stints was more
than twice as great as the average maximum gain. It
should also be noted that one of the winners, from October
2007, showed a gain over the two-week span, but it topped
immediately thereafter and marked the peak of the bull
market.
Yesterday we looked at how the market has performed
during earnings season when sentiment is optimistic, so
let's try that again with Intel's earnings:
QQQQ Performance When Intel
Reports And I.I. Bull Ratio >
70%
Date Two
Weeks Later Max Loss Max Gain
When the Investor's Intelligence Bull Ratio is over 70% and
Intel reports earnings, weakness tended to set in almost
immediately and stay there for awhile. A weak later,
QQQQ was positive only 1 out of 8 times, as it was two weeks
later as shown in the table above (and again, that one
positive instance marked the peak of the bull market).
The risk/reward was skewed heavily towards "risk".
By the end of earnings season, QQQQ was negative every time,
with an average return of -3.5%. The average maximum
gain during the span was +1.6%, compared to an average
maximum decline of...get this...-8.0%.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: Since the March bottom, every time we saw 0% of our indicators at a bullish (for the market) extreme and 30% or more at a bearish extreme, the S&P 500 formed a short-term peak quickly thereafter. We saw that kind of condition again on December 22nd, but the illiquid holiday trading conditions helped minimize any negative impact.
There was another surge in bearish indicators on January 4th, but so far the market is holding above those levels. The latest dip has served to take our indicators off their worst extremes, but we're still seeing more bearish indicators than we have during most of the post-March runup.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Nothing notable for today.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||