|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will turn Neutral if the S&P 500
closes above 1136.
Why:
In March,
we discussed
a large number of reasons to expect an imminent rally of one
to three months' duration, or perhaps even more. The
rally exceeded all expectations. On January 8th, the
Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and every time we've seen
this kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further
short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed
longer-term (over 1-3 months). We expect the same this
time around, so it was a matter of waiting for price action
to crack a little. We're getting some conflicting
studies about whether the price action the past few days is
a sign of a larger trend change, so more than anything we
want to see how any bounce from short-term oversold
conditions plays out. A bounce, then move under
December's low (around 1090) will bring the
intermediate-term trend into question.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Still mildly bearish for the market, but off its worst
levels.
Rrising 200-day avg;
higher highs/higher lows. Sup / Res:
Other:
Resistance at 1115, support
at 1090. Nothing notable.
Indicators - Updates and Extremes
Friday's selling pressure served to move many of our shorter-term
indicators to extremes, giving us one of the most extreme
Indicator Scores of the past decade.
The bounce since then has been weak, but so far support at 1085-1090 is
still holding. Monday was sort of odd since the Cumulative TICK
moved to one of its
most oversold levels in years, and yesterday's failed rally
certainly didn't engender a lot of confidence.
We can see that in the Rydex Beta Chase Index, which dropped to one of
the lowest levels since the March bottom. At a reading of just
above 0.5, it's telling us that Rydex mutual fund traders are almost
twice as likely to trade a "safe" fund as a "risky" one.
The past four times we've seen that, we got at least a short-term bounce
in the S&P.
Given the cornucopia of short-term oversold readings - which have a
consistent tendency to precede bounces even in bad markets - and the
proximity of major support right here, we really shouldn't see much
downside. Obviously, there are a number of important news events
today, which will supersede any technical patterns. With these
conditions, a failure to hold support for more than a day or two will
throw the longer-term trend into question.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: Many of our shorter-term indicators have moved well into oversold territory, especially in the Volatility and Breadth groups.
By Friday's close, we had more bullish (for the market) indicators than bearish ones. The three other times that's occurred since the March low, stocks were able to form bottoms quickly thereafter. If we don't see that now, it will be a definite change in character for this uptrend.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
We're not seeing too many new extremes in the latest updates to the Commitments of Traders or Public Opinion data for commodities and currencies. One commodity that has seen a return to an extreme level of optimism, though, is Lumber.
I'm not reading too much into this one. The reason is that Lumber just formed what I consider a new long-term uptrend by doing three things: 1) breaking the long-term downtrend, 2) testing that breakout point, and 3) moving to a new recovery high. That's the first time that's happened since the peak in 2004. A move under 200 would change the trend back to neutral.
A new uptrend in Lumber will get folks all kinds of giddy about the possibility of a rebound in the housing market. Ostensibly, the highest correlation between Lumber and the housing market is seen in the Housing Starts data. The last monthly report showed a less-than-expected number there, so there's certainly not much evidence yet of an uptick in Starts.
As we can see by the chart below, multi-year extremes in Lumber have done pretty well at coinciding with extremes in Housing Starts. The idea that Lumber has now bottomed should be a positive for Starts, but we should be seeing that reflected in the data already...and so far, not so much.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||