February 5, 2010, 7:30am EST   

  Print Report    Leave a comment  

 
Friday's Need-To-Know  

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

 

* Short-term risk will depend mainly on reactions to the Nonfarm Payroll report, though weekend sovereign credit risk may also weigh on markets.

 

* A large gap down and intraday selling pressure should set up a bounce next week, while a gap up opening is much less conclusive and ironically less of a bullish factor.

 

* The quick failure of the double 1% up days this week may seem ominous, but historically, such quick failures led to important lows within days almost every time.

 

 

The Dumb Money is 46% confident in a rally.

The Smart Money is 50% confident in a rally.

 

Smart/Dumb Confidence

View longer history

 

 

Short-term Outlook:  Neutral  From Jan 27, 1090 SPX

 

 

What:  If the S&P 500 cash index trades at 1035 or below and then reverses up by more than 5 points, we will turn 25% Bullish.

 

Why:  The studies we've looked at this week suggested that Monday's bounce would fail, and the double 1% up days would probably lead to a new multi-month low before any major bottom.  Ironically, now that that's happened, it looks fairly bullish for the intermediate-term (see below), even though the next few sessions could be very hairy.  The big focus today, other than overseas sovereign concerns, is the Nonfarm Payroll report, and as usual if we get a big gap, it's usually a decent "fade" over the coming day(s).  We touched on that in an Intraday Report yesterday.  With that big unknown ahead of us, it's tough to plan out the trading day, but basically I'll be looking for any big whoosh down to be reversed early next week...perhaps even leading to several-week rally.

 

The S&P 500 e-mini futures are trading down 4 points at 1057 as this is sent.

 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Short-term guides are slightly oversold.

All short-term trends are down.

Sup / Res:

Other:

Resistance at 1085 and 1100, support at 1030.

Nothing notable.

 

 

Intermediate-term Outlook:  Neutral  From Feb 2, 1104 SPX

 

 

What:  We will remain Neutral for now.

 

Why:  On January 8th, the Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed longer-term (over 1-3 months).  Now that that's happened again, we're getting conflicting studies about whether the price action over the past two weeks is a sign of a larger trend change.  We don't have an overwhelming number of signs that we have seen a major market peak, and several sentiment measures have turned very quickly from where they were a couple of weeks ago.  The quick failure of the recent multi-month low and double 1% up days, as we discuss below, could actually turn out to be a multi-week positive (as ironic as that sounds), and we'll be watching the next several sessions closely for the possibility of a washout type of bottom.

 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Mostly neutral, though getting a few oversold signals.

Rrising 200-day avg; higher highs/higher lows.

Sup / Res:

Other:

Resistance at 1100-1110, support at 1030.

Nothing notable.

 

 

Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes

 

Double 1% Up Day Failure

 

This is when it gets scary for people.  All recent support levels are broken, we just got a failed bounce, and the S&P had its worst loss in six months.  I'm already seeing more than a few references to the possibility of Black Friday.

 

The thing is, history is chock-full of these scenarios - the S&P having its worst loss in six months to a new multi-month low, when just coming off a 52-week high.  The fact of the matter is that about half the time, the fears were justified.  Not "Black Friday" kind of fears, but new intermediate-term decline kind of fears (see August 1990, March 1966, August 1957 as examples).

 

But half the time the fears were completely out of line, as the market bottomed that day or very soon thereafter (see February 2007, October 1997, November 1963 as examples).

 

Let's revisit the pattern we looked at in a Research Report on Tuesday and the Morning Report on Wednesday.  That was where the S&P hit a multi-month low, then enjoyed consecutive 1% up days.  The reports suggested that it was probably not the bottom, and we would most likely hit a new multi-month low before a meaningful rally, particularly if we saw short-term downside follow-through.

 

Well, we got the downside and we've already hit a new low.  So now let's look at every one of those patterns that failed almost immediately.  What we're going to see below is every instance where we got the double 1% up days, then rolled over a sunk to a new multi-month low within two weeks.

 

The results are very interesting.

 

S&P 500 Performance After Failed Bottom

Coming Off Of Two-Month Low and Consecutive 1% Up Days

      After New Low...

Date Of

Double

1% Days

Date Of

New Low

Loss

Days 'Til

New Low

1 Week

Later

1 Month

Later

3 Months

Later

Days 'Til

Important

Low

05/31/62 06/13/62 -6.9% 9 -1.3% 4.2% 6.0% 9
02/12/73 02/23/73 -2.5% 8 -0.8% -1.4% -5.3% 2
09/17/74 09/27/74 -3.6% 8 -4.0% 14.4% 3.4% 4
10/01/90 10/10/90 -4.6% 7 -0.5% 2.4% 4.7% 1
06/05/98 06/15/98 -3.3% 6 2.4% 9.1% -4.4% 0
08/18/98 08/27/98 -5.3% 7 -5.8% 0.6% 13.8% 2
03/26/01 04/03/01 -4.0% 6 5.6% 12.8% 11.6% 1
01/31/02 02/04/02 -3.2% 2 1.6% 6.2% -3.8% 3
09/26/02 09/30/02 -4.6% 2 -3.7% 8.2% 7.9% 7
09/19/08 09/29/08 -11.8% 6 -4.5% -15.0% -21.4% 20
Median -4.3% 7 -1.1% 5.2% 4.1% 3

 

It took a median of 7 days, and a loss of -4.3%, before the S&P hit a new multi-month low.  A couple of times, it happened as quick as our current instance and did it in only 2 days.

 

But look at the other columns.  While short-term performance was mostly bad, in every case but one (a big failure during the 2008 distress) we were within days of an important low that lasted for several weeks at least.

 

While the logical assumption would be that such a quick failure of the 1% up days is an incredibly ominous sign, it was almost without exception the exact opposite.  By the time we hit a new low, the selling pressure was already nearly completed.

 

I've looked at a multitude of studies overnight, viewing the current selling in various lights.  The conclusions were almost universal - we should be within 1-3 days of a tradeable bounce, but the "tail risk" of a painful short-term washout is higher than average.  While a huge gap down and major selling pressure during the day would likely lead to at least a short-term bottom by Monday, we'll have to wait and see how the market reacts to the Payroll report and possibly even weekend news about sovereign credit risk.

Equity Market Indicators

 

Notes:

Last week, we had more bullish (for the market) indicators than bearish ones.  The three other times that had occurred since the March low, stocks were able to form bottoms quickly thereafter.  This time, it took a bit longer, but again the market rallied off of those conditions.

 

Currently, there is a mix of bullish and bearish indicators, which is not suggestive of much of an edge either way.

 

More history:   Short-term Score     Long-term Score    Indicators At Extremes

 

 

* New extreme

See all indicators

 

Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes

 

Nothing notable for today.

 

 

Jason Goepfert

Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

 

 

Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.

 

VISIT THE SUBSCRIBER HOME PAGE

 

Privacy Policy      |      Disclaimer

 

© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  All rights reserved.

sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165  Blaine, MN  55434