|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will remain Neutral for now.
Why: On January 8th, the
Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen
that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further
short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed
longer-term (over 1-3 months). Now that that's
happened again, we're getting conflicting
studies about whether the price action over the past two weeks is
a sign of a larger trend change. We don't have an
overwhelming number of
signs that we have seen a major market peak, and several
sentiment measures have turned very quickly from where they
were a couple of weeks ago. The quick failure of the
recent multi-month low and double 1% up days, as we discuss
below, could actually turn out to be a multi-week positive
(as ironic as that sounds), and we'll be watching the next
several sessions closely for the possibility of a washout
type of bottom.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Mostly neutral, though getting a few oversold signals.
Rrising 200-day avg;
higher highs/higher lows. Sup / Res:
Other:
Resistance at 1100-1110, support
at 1030. Nothing notable.
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
Double 1% Up Day Failure
This is when it gets scary for people. All recent
support levels are broken, we just got a failed bounce, and
the S&P had its worst loss in six months. I'm already
seeing more than a few references to the possibility of
Black Friday.
The thing is, history is chock-full of these scenarios - the
S&P having its worst loss in six months to a new multi-month
low, when just coming off a 52-week high. The fact of
the matter is that about half the time, the fears were
justified. Not "Black Friday" kind of fears, but new
intermediate-term decline kind of fears (see August 1990,
March 1966, August 1957 as examples).
But half the time the fears were completely out of line, as
the market bottomed that day or very soon thereafter (see
February 2007, October 1997, November 1963 as examples).
Let's revisit the pattern we looked at in a Research Report
on
Tuesday and the Morning Report on
Wednesday. That was where the S&P hit a
multi-month low, then enjoyed consecutive 1% up days.
The reports suggested that it was probably not the bottom,
and we would most likely hit a new multi-month low before a
meaningful rally, particularly if we saw short-term downside
follow-through.
Well, we got the downside and we've already hit a new low.
So now let's look at every one of those patterns that failed
almost immediately. What we're going to see below is
every instance where we got the double 1% up days, then
rolled over a sunk to a new multi-month low within two
weeks.
The results are very interesting.
S&P 500 Performance After Failed
Bottom
Coming Off Of Two-Month Low
and Consecutive 1% Up Days
Date Of Double 1% Days
Date Of New Low
Loss
Days 'Til New Low 1
Week Later 1
Month Later 3
Months Later
Days 'Til Important Low
It took a median of 7 days, and a loss of -4.3%, before the
S&P hit a new multi-month low. A couple of times, it
happened as quick as our current instance and did it in only
2 days.
But look at the other columns. While short-term
performance was mostly bad, in every case but one (a big
failure during the 2008 distress) we were within days of an
important low that lasted for several weeks at least.
While the logical assumption would be that such a quick
failure of the 1% up days is an incredibly ominous sign, it
was almost without exception the exact opposite. By
the time we hit a new low, the selling pressure was already
nearly completed.
I've looked at a multitude of studies overnight, viewing the
current selling in various lights. The conclusions
were almost universal - we should be within 1-3 days of a
tradeable bounce, but the "tail risk" of a painful
short-term washout is higher than average. While a
huge gap down and major selling pressure during the day
would likely lead to at least a short-term bottom by Monday,
we'll have to wait and see how the market reacts to the
Payroll report and possibly even weekend news about
sovereign credit risk.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: Last week, we had more bullish (for the market) indicators than bearish ones. The three other times that had occurred since the March low, stocks were able to form bottoms quickly thereafter. This time, it took a bit longer, but again the market rallied off of those conditions.
Currently, there is a mix of bullish and bearish indicators, which is not suggestive of much of an edge either way.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Nothing notable for today.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||