February 26, 2010, 7:45am EST   

  Print Report    Leave a comment  

 
Friday's Need-To-Know  

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

 

* Yesterday's price reversal was unusual given the weakness during the first part of the session, and it created many mixed readings in our short-term indicators.

 

* The price reversal was notable, and one way of looking at it suggests that the upside should continue in the short-term, especially when combined with an extreme in the put/call ratio.

 

* Individual investors have largely moved to the Neutral camp, along with newsletter writers, as the latest AAII survey shows the highest Neutral response in four years.

 

 

 

The Dumb Money is 54% confident in a rally.

The Smart Money is 42% confident in a rally.

 

Smart/Dumb Confidence

View longer history

 

 

Short-term Outlook:  25% Bearish  From Feb 25, 1091 SPX

 

 

What:  We will move back to Neutral with a trade in the S&P 500 cash index above 1107.

 

Why:  Well, that didn't work well at all.  We had a couple of lingering short-term negatives heading into yesterday's gap down open, and despite my usual hesitation of selling into large gaps down, the fact that we made no real attempt to close the gap during the first hour of trading was a consistently successful sign that we wouldn't reverse later in the day.  That failed miserably this time.  Now we have a couple of short-term indications that the reversal should be able to continue (see below), and I have no continued interest in betting against this whipsaw market with that in mind if we're able to get back over that 1106 area tagged previously as probable resistance.

 

Current S&P futures:  +1 point at 1103 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Short-term guides are mixed.

Mixed readings.

Sup / Res:

Other:

Resistance at 1110, support at 1080.

Nothing notable.

 

 

Intermediate-term Outlook:  Neutral  From Feb 2, 1104 SPX

 

 

What:  We will remain Neutral for now.

 

Why:  On January 8th, the Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed longer-term (over 1-3 months).  Now that that's happened again, we're getting conflicting studies about whether the price action over the past two weeks is a sign of a larger trend change.  We don't have an overwhelming number of signs that we have seen a major market peak, and several sentiment measures turned very quickly from where they were in mid-January.  We looked at a couple of studies in early February that suggested we could be very close to a multi-week low, but they didn't quite trigger as prices recovered more quickly than they "should" have.  That leaves us without much of a bias for a multi-month time frame.

 

Sentiment:

Trend: 

Mostly neutral.

Still pointing up.

Sup / Res:

Other:

Resistance at 1100-1110, support at 1050-1060.

Nothing notable.

 

 

Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes

 

AAII Sentiment Survey

 

Earlier this month, we took a look at the surge in Neutral responses among the newsletter writers polled by Investor's Intelligence.  Technically, there isn't a Neutral category in that survey, but those who are generally bullish yet expect a short-term correction are considered so.

 

There wasn't too much we could conclude from that development, as it was so historically rare.  Apparently it isn't just newsletter writers who are confused; the latest poll from the American Association Of Individual Investors (AAII) shows a surge in Neutral responses as well.

 

 

Once again, there wasn't anything predictive about a multi-year high in Neutral responses.  Sometimes it led to a rally, sometimes a decline, and sometimes a flat market.

 

Looking at various combinations, though, one thing stood out:  when the S&P 500 was positive in the three months leading up to the high Neutral reading, then it tended to decline in the three months afterward; when the S&P had declined heading into it, then it tended to rally.

 

There were four weeks (not including the current one) when the Neutral responses hit a two-year high and the S&P was positive over the prior three months.  Over the next three months, the S&P showed the following returns:

 

07/29/94:  +1.4%

10/17/97:  -1.7%

06/05/98:  -7.8%

12/31/09:  -0.5% (so far)

 

And here are the instances when the S&P had declined over the prior three months, along with their returns over the next three months:

 

08/16/96:  +9.9%

09/06/96:  +15.5%

02/11/00:  +3.3%

01/31/03:  +5.0%

04/08/05:  +1.1%

01/30/09:  +4.9%

 

This study suffers from a small sample size and a little bit of data mining, so any conclusions are shaky, but it's at least interesting that there was such a stark difference between when the market had risen versus declined heading into the high Neutral readings.  If we do draw any conclusions from this, then it would suggest a modest downside bias going forward over the intermediate-term in our current case.

 

 

Equity-Only Put/Call Ratio

 

On a much (much!) shorter time frame, yesterday's reversal was remarkable.

 

While there are a number of different ways to quantify such a fakeout, and perhaps some of them will give conflicting signals (that's the problem with purely quantitative studies).  But to me the most intriguing aspect of yesterday's action was that the S&P 500 SPDR (SPY) gapped down more than -1%, closed above its open by more than +1%, yet still closed in negative territory (below the prior day's close).

 

In that fund's history, there have been 20 other similar days.  And over the next two days, it managed to add to the late-day gains 17 times (an 85% success rate) with an average return of +2.5%.  This was strictly a short-term phenomenon - looking out any longer than a few days, and the probability of a rising market moves back to random.

 

What was also notable about yesterday was the extreme registered in the Equity-Only Put/Call Ratio.  On the chart we update daily on the site, we use bands around the indicator to monitor extremes.  Yesterday, the put/call ratio closed more than 30% beyond its average over the past six months.

 

 

So we got a major price reversal and an indication of excessive pessimism.  What happens when we put them together on the same day?

 

As you might suspect, the results were rare but quite positive.  Over the next two days, the S&P 500 was positive 6 out of 7 times, and sported an average return of +4.0%.  That outsized return is due to the exceptional volatility we tended to see accompany such extreme readings.

 

Here are the dates along with the S&P's return over the next couple of days:

 

10/08/98:  +3.5%

10/18/00:  +4.2%

09/17/01:  -2.3%

09/21/01:  +4.6%

06/14/02:  +3.5%

03/17/08:  +1.6%

10/10/08:  +12.8%

 

Like the pure price reversal study above, this was best used as a very short-term indication only, as the longer-term the results were mixed.  Still, it suggests a continuation of yesterday's reversal heading into the new month.

 

Equity Market Indicators

 

Notes:

During the volatile correction of the past two weeks, we saw a spike in our Bullish (for the market) indicators to 30%, and the Bearish very nearly reached 0%.  That coincided with the low (so far), though as we noted at the time, when the indicators get that extreme, they tend to keep going, and we usually see at least 50% bullish indicators at the ultimate low.  Currently, they're back to about even and not telling us much either way.

 

More history:   Short-term Score     Long-term Score    Indicators At Extremes

 

 

* New extreme

See all indicators

 

Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes

 

Nothing notable for today.

 

Jason Goepfert

Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

 

 

Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.

 

VISIT THE SUBSCRIBER HOME PAGE

 

Privacy Policy      |      Disclaimer

 

© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  All rights reserved.

sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165  Blaine, MN  55434