|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term
Outlook:
Intermediate-term Outlook:
What: We will remain Neutral for now.
Why: On January 8th, the
Dumb Money Confidence hit 75%, and nearly every time we've seen
that kind of extreme in the past 15 years, any further
short-term strength (over 2-4 weeks) was reversed
longer-term (over 1-3 months). That happened again,
then we got some conflicting studies in early February about
whether we were likely at a low. We were oh-so-close
to triggering some very bullish multi-week setups, but price
reversed too early and we were left out. We still don't have an
overwhelming number of
signs that we have seen a major market peak, and now we
have the
advance/decline line at a new all-time high and
extreme momentum in small-cap stocks, which
usually pull stocks up along with them. So unless
sentiment becomes overly optimistic very quickly, we'll
likely at least challenge the January highs...though the
risk/reward of trading it on an intermediate-term basis
seems only modestly positive due to the rally we've already
seen since the February low.
Sentiment:
Trend:
Mostly neutral.
Still pointing up. Sup / Res:
Other:
R: 1150; S: 1110 Positive breadth, small-cap
momentum
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
S&P 500 Up For 9 Straight Days
This is certainly a streaky, momentum market. So far
we've looked at a record drop in the
VIX "fear gauge", and the persistent uptrend in the
small-cap
Russell 2000 index.
Now we have the S&P 500 index up for 9 consecutive trading
days. When occurring near a 52-week high, this is the
longest streak since November 2004.
Like we did with the other cases, let's not just assume this is bullish
("if stocks can't go down, then they'll go up") or bearish ("streaks
don't last much longer than this") and instead look at history. The table below
looks at all streaks of 9 straight up days since 1928 when the index was
within 1% of a 52-week high, and the S&P's
performance going forward.
For the most part, the results were mediocre. This
kind of sustained momentum so near a new high didn't tend to
lead to gangbusters breakouts...or momentous declines.
Usually, stocks just kind of sat there and didn't do much.
Only one instance (October 1989) led to anything more than a
-4% correction at any point during the following month.
The one in August 1929 led to the crash in October of that
year, but not before the S&P managed to climb another 4% or
so over the next month. In all, only that one led to
more than a -10% drop at the worst point over the next three
months; seven of them led to gains of more than +10%.
As for how long the streak can last, out of the 26
occurrences, 7 of them went on to 10 days, 3 went to 11
days, 4 went to 12 days and 1 went to 14 days.
Rydex traders have finally jumped onto the uptrend, with a
couple of our shorter-term indicators there pushing into
extreme territory yesterday and today.
One of those is the Beta Chase Index, which looks at how
aggressively traders in the Rydex mutual funds are buying into
"risky" funds versus "safe" funds. As of yesterday,
they were 5 times more likely to trade a risky fund.
The chart below shows this index since the March bottom,
along with how higher-risk, higher-beta stocks (using the Nasdaq 100 as a proxy)
performed against the S&P 500.
Each time, we saw the Nasdaq 100 under-perform the S&P over
the next 1-4 weeks, as the rush into riskier assets
subsided.
What this argues for now, of course, is that the powerhouse
tech stocks that have been helping to lead the rally should
pause a bit, at least in relation to the overall market,
until we see traders less willing to be so aggressive.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: During the volatile correction into early February, we saw a spike in our Bullish (for the market) indicators to 30%, and the Bearish very nearly reached 0%. That coincided with the low in equities.
The rebound since then was met with mostly mediocre readings in our indicators, but that changed on Friday with more than 20% surging into bearish territory. It would need to reach at least 30% to signal any potential trouble, at least based on the tendencies we've seen since the March 2009 bottom.
More history:
* New extreme
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Nothing notable for today.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||