|
Morning Report October 14, 2010, 7:50am EST |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term Outlook | Int-term Outlook | Equity Updates | Indicator Summary | Commodity Updates
Short-term
Outlook (1-5 Days):
Intermediate-term Outlook (1-3 Months):
Summary: The breakout from 9/20 was
confirmation of the bullish studies from late August.
But given some recent indicators, we will move to Neutral if SPY fails and trades below 116.75.
Detail: No change from
October 8th.
The 4 Anchors:
Top |
Short-term Outlook
| Int-term Outlook |
Equity Updates |
Indicator Summary |
Commodity Updates
Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes
Federal Reserve Permanent Open Market Operations
Anyone who's read this
site over the past 9 years knows that I'm not a conspiracy theorist. Out
of the approximately 2,500 comments posted, I've alluded to market manipulation
probably less than half a dozen times. Whenever I hear about
"evil investment banks" or "politicized Fed bankers" or "automatic trading
algorithms", my eyes kind of glaze over, I huff "get over it" and I concentrate
on the work. But I'll be perfectly
honest here - I'm starting to crack. It's not just because the latest
setup has failed to comply with extremely high-probability odds. It's that
trading patterns during the day, especially lately, are not what we've typically
seen in the past. Yesterday is a perfect
example - we were seeing persistently weak readings in the NYSE TICK indicator
(meaning that more stocks last traded on a downtick than an uptick), and yet the
S&P futures kept creeping higher at the same time. That is extraordinarily
unusual. I'm not going to turn
into some Zero Hedge
wannabe who looks at every tick as evidence of manipulators at work. The
market has always been manipulated by somebody - the story never changes, only
the characters do. But today I do want to
touch on something that's getting a lot of attention, which is the latest
announcement of Permanent Open Market Operations (POMO) by the Federal Reserve,
found
here. This is where the Fed announces, in general, what they are going
to buy and how much. Many are starting to believe that these funds wind
their way through the system and end up in the stock market. I'm not going to pretend
that I have any great insight as to whether this is true, the actual mechanics
of how it would work, or what other ways the Fed might be using to prop up stock
prices. I'm just going to take their data at face value and see what
impact it has had on stocks. So let's use the Fed's
data on their POMO days to see if the S&P 500 had any tendency to rise on those
days, or immediately thereafter. The table below shows
the S&P's performance on days there were no POMO buys, and compares that to all
POMO days, those greater than and less than $3.5 billion, and then by the
different types of bond purchases that the Fed does. The data begins in
August 2005.
One thing stands out pretty clear - the market was more likely to rally, and
with a significantly higher return - after POMO days than after non-POMO days.
Looking at returns one month later, if there were no POMO operations, the S&P
was positive 58% of the time with a median return of -0.3%. But if the Fed
was active on a particular day, then a month later the S&P was up 78% of the
time with a return of +2.6%. That's a stark difference.
And the larger the operation, the better the S&P did a month later.
Looking at the various types of operations, the most impact seemed to be with
Coupon Purchases (listed as Outright Treasury Coupon Purchase on the Fed's
website). And the most positive of all were large Coupon Purchases - if
the operation was greater than $3.5 billion on those days, then a month later
the S&P 500 was positive 89% of the time (33 out of 37 days) with a median
return of +3.4%.
Looking at the Fed's website, it looks like that's exactly what we're in store
for during the coming weeks.
It's exceptionally difficult for me to rely on data like this for trading
decisions. Citing conspiracy theories for the basis of trades smacks of
desperation. But it's hard to argue with the data above, and the unusual
way in which the market has been behaving.
Top |
Short-term Outlook
| Int-term Outlook |
Equity Updates |
Indicator Summary |
Commodity Updates
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity Market Indicators
Notes: In late August, we got a spike in bullish (for the market) indicators near the 30% level, similar to what we saw in late May and late June, and once again we saw almost immediate buying pressure. Unfortunately, we didn't quite reach the kind of extreme we have previously before the market took off. With the rally over the past month, bearish indicators have climbed but haven't reached the 30% threshold.
More history:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes
Nothing notable for today.
Jason Goepfert Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.
Top | Short-term Outlook | Int-term Outlook | Equity Updates | Indicator Summary | Commodity Updates
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||