Previous Report    Print    Comment    Archive

Morning Report                                                                  October 19, 2010, 7:55am EST

 

Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 
Tuesday's Need-To-Know  

Smart / Dumb Money Confidence

 

The market has not done well following Apple earnings when that stock has ramped so much so soon.  Even with the gap down, the stock has tended to struggle for the next few weeks.

 

Pension funds are fleeing the stock market, at least according to the WSJ and Bloomberg.  While we still have to wait more than a month before we get any hard figures, historically the market has done exceptionally well when pension funds flee the market - even if it's not all that extreme.

 

 

The Dumb Money is 58% confident in a rally.

The Smart Money is 33% confident in a rally.

 

Smart/Dumb Confidence

 (click chart for larger version)

 

 

Short-term Outlook (1-5 Days):  25% Short (from 10/18 at 117.65)

 

 

Active Studies
Date Study Forecast
10/14 Fed POMO activity UP
10/13 NDX at a high after Intel DOWN
10/11 VIX at low during October DOWN
     
 

See a list of retired studies

 

Summary:  Given the multitude of troubling studies we've looked at over the past week, we're still looking for downside.  If SPY trades back at a new high, clearly that premise is wrong, so we'll go back to Neutral if SPY hits 118.70.

 

Detail:  There isn't too much new on a short-term basis, as we're still waiting to see if the market will finally follow through on the bearish studies we've been discussing for a week now.

 

Apple could certainly provide a downside spark, along with the other less-than-inspiring news since yesterday's close.

 

As I mentioned on Twitter (also found on the Intraday Snapshot), there have been four other times in recent history that Apple had rallied 30% over a few months and traded at a new 52-week high on the day they reported earnings.  Buying that stock the next morning and holding for three weeks would have given returns of -5.0%, -16.8%, -3.7% and -18.5%...so not exactly a great time to chase the market, especially since that one stock makes up more than 20% of the entire Nasdaq 100.  The market has bucked its historical bias since Intel, but this is another doozy.

 

So I'm still looking for some of that downside to finally kick in here.  If the market can recover from this setup, then it's going to be very difficult to justify continuing to look for any weakness.

 

Current SPY:  -1.06 at 117.51

 

The 4 Anchors:

1. Sentiment: 

2. Studies:

3. Trend:

4. Sup/Res:

 

Support at 115.00 and 113.20

Resistance at 118.00

 

 

Intermediate-term Outlook (1-3 Months):  Neutral  (from 10/14 at 116.75)

 

Summary:  Due to a recent spike in the number of bearish studies and seasonal patterns, we're going to stand aside and see if this uptrend can continue or (more likely) start to falter.

 

Detail:  No change from October 15th.

 

The 4 Anchors:
1. Sentiment:  2. Studies:
3. Trend: 4. Sup/Res:

 

 

 

Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 

 

Equity Indicators - Updates and Extremes

 

Pension Fund Asset Allocations

 

The Wall Street Journal ran an article over the weekend stating that pension funds were "fleeing" stocks and moving toward more-conservative investments, which is curious given how far many of them must rise in order to meet their obligations to employees.

 

Pension funds are herds of elephants roaming the plains - they don't change direction all that much, and when they do they all go together.  As we'll see in a minute, they'd probably best be served by doing the opposite of what their brethren are doing.

 

According to the Federal Reserve, pension funds have allocated 65% of their total assets to the stock market.  For the first time in history, they now hold more money in mutual funds than they do in individual equities (more evidence of herd behavior).

 

Bonds, meanwhile, get just 20% of their attention.  That's up from what it was near the stock market peak in 2007, but not by much.  They allocate just 5% of their funds to "cash", which I've taken to include all extremely short-term and liquid investments.  Another 10% is allocated to a mish-mash of other investments, a big chunk of which the Fed just calls "miscellaneous".

 

 

From the chart above, we can see that funds had a very high allocation to stocks in the early 1970's when the S&P 500 peaked.  During the ensuing bear market, funds fled stocks and dropped their allocation down to about 40%...and never really lifted it despite a resurgent stock market.

 

That changed in the 1990's as they put more and more money into stocks (or, more accurately, mutual funds).  Finally, they were at their highest stock allocation ever in 2007, with 76% of their funds invested in the market.  They got thumped hard during 2008, and reduced stock market exposure to 62% - still historically high, but the lowest in over a decade.

 

It's hard to see from that chart, but on a shorter-term basis, the funds do not act in their contributors' best interests.  They flee stocks en masse, then get back in in the same manner.

 

The chart below shows the year-over-year percentage change in their stock market allocations.  Generally, anything beyond +/- 10% can be considered extreme.  Currently we're at +1%, so nothing notable.

 

 

 

The table below shows the S&P 500's future returns 1, 2 and 3 years following quarters when pension funds fled stocks to an extreme degree.  For comparison, the table looks at both -5% and -10% year/year changes.

 

 

1 Year

Later

2 Years

Later

3 Years

Later

Below -5% (41 occurrences)
Median 16.3% 29.3% 42.8%
% Positive 78% 89% 95%
     
Below -10% (11 occurrences)
Median 26.0% 36.5% 42.6%
% Positive 93% 91% 100%

 

The results are impressive...if one had done the exact opposite of the pension funds.  Three years later, with even a -5% change in their stock allocation, one would have enjoyed a median return of nearly 43%, and would have had a positive return after all but two quarters.

 

If the funds had really dumped stocks and went below that -10% marker, then the returns were even more impressive, but of course the number of incidents drops as well.  The returns were especially notable one year later, which were astronomical.

 

Now let's flip it over and look at those times the funds had to get back into stocks in a hurry.  Almost inevitably, this was after stocks had already rallied.

 

 

1 Year

Later

2 Years

Later

3 Years

Later

Above +5% (89 occurrences)
Median 6.9% 13.0% 21.4%
% Positive 67% 80% 80%
     
Above +10% (36 occurrences)
Median 7.3% 10.7% 18.9%
% Positive 69% 78% 75%

 

Predictably, the returns were much poorer than the ones from the table above.  They were still positive owing to the long-term trend of the market, but they were much less impressive than if the funds would have simply done the opposite of what everyone else was doing.

 

The fact that funds are apparently fleeing stocks now, at least according to the Journal and Bloomberg, then that may bode well for the long-term outlook for stocks once these funds turn tail yet again and chase the market higher.

 

This data is released quarterly, with the most recent data covering the 2nd quarter of 2010.  The third quarter's data will be released in early December, when we'll get to see just how much of a change the funds underwent during the summer months.

 

 

Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 

 

Equity Market Indicators

 

Notes:

In late August, we got a spike in bullish (for the market) indicators near the 30% level, similar to what we saw in late May and late June, and once again we saw almost immediate buying pressure.  Unfortunately, we didn't quite reach the kind of extreme we have previously before the market took off.  With the rally over the past month, bearish indicators have climbed but haven't reached the 30% threshold.

 

More history:   Short-term Score     Long-term Score    Indicators At Extremes

 

 

Bonds, Commodities and Currencies - Updates and Extremes

 

Nothing notable for today.

 

 

Jason Goepfert

Founder, Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

 

Top  |  Short-term Outlook  |  Int-term Outlook  |  Equity Updates  |  Indicator Summary  |  Commodity Updates

 

 

 

Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.

 

VISIT THE SUBSCRIBER HOME PAGE

 

Privacy Policy      |      Disclaimer

 

© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  All rights reserved.

sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc.

Sundial Capital Research, Inc.  12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165  Blaine, MN  55434