|
Morning Report October 27, 2010, 7:45am EST |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Short-term Outlook
| Intermediate-term Outlook |
Updates & Studies |
Indicator Summary
Short-term
Outlook (1-5 Days):
Intermediate-term Outlook (1-3 Months):
Summary: Due to a recent spike in the number of bearish studies and
seasonal patterns, we're going to stand aside and see if this uptrend can
continue or (more likely) start to falter.
Detail: No change from
October 15th.
The 4 Anchors:
Top |
Short-term Outlook
| Intermediate-term Outlook |
Updates & Studies |
Indicator Summary
Midterm Elections There isn't much new in
terms of sentiment that we haven't already discussed lately, so I want to touch
on something that has generated a lot of questions over the past couple of days. Traders have come to the
belief that the market simply does not go down in the days leading up to and
immediately following midterm elections. So whatever bearish setup might
be out there (if there are any left) will likely be steamrolled by this positive
seasonality. Seasonality can be a
powerful force, but it's rarely a reason to abandon everything else.
Anyway, let's go back to 1922, the furthest back that I can find reliable dates,
and see how the market performed around these elections. I used Dow Jones
Industrial Average prices prior to 1950, and S&P 500 prices thereafter.
Also, election dates were exchange holidays prior to 1970, so the market was
closed on election day leading up to then.
As most of you have
probably heard by now, the seasonality surrounding these dates has been
exceptionally positive. The day of and day after
have been OK, but it's the period leading up to and immediately after the
elections that have been so impressive - partly because of the usual
end-of-month / beginning-of-month bullish bias but also probably due to the
elections themselves. Since the elections
ceased to become a holiday, the market has suffered a bit more on the day of the
election, with generally muted returns, but it has still had an overall positive
expectation. As for the multi-day
window surrounding the midterms, we saw a negative return only 2 out of 22 years
and overall the median return was an impressive +2.5%. The "Max Loss" column
shows the worst dip (using closing prices) during those multi-day windows, and
we see the unusual circumstance where the max loss is actually a positive
number - in other words, it would be the equivalent of the S&P not closing below
yesterday's close of 1185 anytime between today and next Thursday. Only 4
of the years saw a loss of more than -1%, and 3 of those were just barely. The maximum gain,
though, was excellent with a median of +3.6%. There were only two years
where the market didn't rally at all, but otherwise 16 out of the 22 had rallies
of at least +2% sometime during the next week or so. I don't want to rely on
this too much, as it's only a seasonal bias and it's fairly well-known, but the
market has clearly been bucking any bearish influences over the past two weeks
so this is one semi-concrete reason to expect it to continue to do so.
Top |
Short-term Outlook
| Intermediate-term Outlook |
Updates & Studies |
Indicator Summary
Forwarding or other distribution of this email is prohibited without the express permission of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. If you do not possess a firm-wide license, then forwarding this message will violate your subscription agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 2001-2010 Sundial Capital Research, Inc. All rights reserved. sentimenTrader.com is a trademark of Sundial Capital Research, Inc. Sundial Capital Research, Inc. 12527 Central Avenue NE, Suite 165 Blaine, MN 55434
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||