Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

A short-term breadth washout and initial recovery

Jason Goepfert
2020-10-30
On Monday and Wednesday, selling pressure was heavy enough to push the 3-day average of both NYSE Up Issues and Up Volume below 20%, which recovered a bit by Thursday. During relatively healthy markets, this has typically led to shorter-term weakness, but medium-term strength.

On Monday and Wednesday, selling pressure was overwhelming enough that most securities fell, and most of the volume on the NYSE was focused on those issues.

The 3-day average of NYSE Up Issues and Up Volume both dropped to below 20%. That shows wholesale, get-me-out selling pressure. Often, we'll see a lot of down issues, but maybe not a lot of volume. Or maybe there will be a lot of volume flowing into relatively few declining stocks.

Earlier this week, it was both. The 3-day average of NYSE Up Issues dropped to within the lowest 0.2% of all readings since 1962.

Up Volume fell to within the lowest 0.4% of all readings.

Thursday's rebound was enough to push those average back above 20%, showing a potential recovery, though longer-term measures haven't reached oversold yet and Friday's activity will change this somewhat.

It's not all that unusual to see extremely depressed breadth over a multi-day period during a bear market. It's rarer to see it when stocks have been holding up fairly well. Below, we can see every time the 3-day average of both Up Issues and Up Volume rose above 20% while the S&P 500 was above its 200-day moving average at the time.

The sample size is small, but for what it's worth, the S&P tended to fall back over the short-term, then rally over the medium-term. There was only one loss of any consequence 2 months later.

If we forget about the 200-day average and just look at times when the S&P at least wasn't more than 20% below its highest level of the past 3 years, then we get more of a sample size.

Despite many more signals, the same basic pattern held, with shorter-term weakness and medium-term strength. Over the next 2 months, there were no losses greater than -2%.

It was much more unusual if the S&P was within 10% of its prior peak, as it was this time.

There was only a single loss during the next 1-2 months, with relatively small risk. The troubling part was the 6-12 month time frame, which showed a loss every time but once.

Overall, this kind of behavior has typically led to some shorter-term give-back of whatever gains helped to push the Up Issue and Up Volume Ratios above 20%. But over the next 1-3 months, there was a strong tendency to see gains following the selling pressure that was extreme enough to push them both below 20% in the first place.

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.