Products
SentimenTrader Trading Tools
‍
Backtest Engine
My Trading Toolkit
Correlation Analysis
Seasonality
Market Prediction
Indicators & Data API
‍
Proprietary Indicators & Charts
Market Data API
Strategies & Scanner
‍
50+ Trading Strategies
Smart Stock Scanner
Smart Option Scanner
Research Reports
‍
Research Solutions
Reports Library
Free Resources
Simple Backtest Calculator
Simple Seasonality Calculator
The Kelly Criterion Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
Public Research Reports
Education
Sentiment Indicators
Technical Indicators
Pricing
Company
About
In the News
Testimonials
Client Success Stories
Contact
Log inLoginSign up
< BACK TO ALL REPORTS

Staples versus discretionary versus inflation

Jay Kaeppel
2022-03-02
Inflation affects consumers' purchasing power. When inflation is moderate, individuals are more likely to focus on "wants." However, when inflation is high, they are often forced to focus more on "needs." This creates an opportunity for investors - by focusing on consumer discretionary when inflation is moderate and on consumer staples when inflation is abnormally high or low.

Key Points

  • Being in the right sector at the right time is one of the lesser appreciated keys to above-average performance
  • The level of price inflation impacts purchasing power and thus affects different sectors differently
  • In this piece, we look at performance for consumer staples versus consumer discretionary based on varying levels of inflation

Staples versus Discretionary: A systematic approach

One factor that few investors consider when allocating between staples and discretionary is inflation. Let's focus on a strategy that relies solely on inflation to decide whether to be in the staples or discretionary sectors. We will:

  • Measure inflation using the 12-month rate-of-change in the Consumer Price Index
  • Analyze the latest available data only at the end of each month
  • Use the month-end reading to decide what to hold during the following month

The rules are simple. If inflation is:

  • Relatively high (greater than or equal to +3%) OR relatively low (less than or equal to -3%, i.e., deflation) we will favor consumer staples
  • Within a range of relatively mild readings (greater than -3% to less than +3%), we will prefer consumer discretionary

For testing, we will use S&P Industry Group data from Bloomberg dating from January 1, 1927, through February 28, 2022. The cumulative returns for each sector based on inflation at the end of the previous month appear below.

The bottom line is that discretionary has vastly outperformed over a long period of time when inflation is moderate, and staples have significantly outperformed when inflation is abnormally high or low.

Periods of above or below average inflation

The chart below displays the growth of $1 invested in staples and discretionary sectors ONLY when inflation is above 3% or below -3%.

The chart below displays the growth of $1 in staples divided by $1 in discretionary during periods of above or below average inflation. Notice there wasn't much difference until the 1960s. From there, staples have vastly outperformed. 

At the far right of the chart below, note that inflation crossed above +3% at the end of June 2021. For the first four months, discretionary outperformed. Since then, things have shifted dramatically back in favor of staples.

Periods of moderate inflation

The chart below displays the growth of $1 invested in staples and discretionary sectors ONLY when inflation is above -3% and below +3%, i.e., not too high or low.

The chart below displays the growth of $1 in discretionary divided by $1 in staples during periods of average inflation (between plus and minus 3%). 

Creating a strategy

Now let's compare the following strategies:

  • Starting in January 1999 using monthly total return data for ETFs XLP (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund)
  • Strategy A holds XLY (discretionary) when inflation is -3% to +3% and holds XLP (staples) when inflation is greater than +3% or less than -3%.
  • Strategy B splits 50/50 between staples and discretionary on a buy-and-hold basis

The chart below displays the cumulative hypothetical growth of $1 invested using strategy A and strategy B

From January 1999 through February 2022, Strategy A grew +1,633%, and Strategy B grew +578%. The chart below displays the growth of Strategy A divided by the growth of Strategy B.

More recently, CPI inflation crossed above +3% at the end of June 2021. Since that time and through 3/1/2022, XLP is up +8.6%, and XLY is up +1.3%.

What the research tells us…

In a macro sense, the consumer discretionary sector represents "wants," and the consumer staples sector represents "needs." Because inflation impacts purchasing power, it affects people's buying decisions. When inflation is moderate, individuals are generally more comfortable spending their money on "wants." However, when inflation is abnormally high or low, individuals tend to focus primarily on spending their money on "needs." The long-term results displayed in the charts above suggest that this theory is true. 

PRODUCTS
SentimenTrader
Trading Tools
Indicators & Data API
‍
Strategies & Scanner
‍
Research Reports
FREE
RESOUrCES
Simple Backtest
Calculator
Simple Seasonality
Calculator
The Kelly Criterion
Calculator
Sentiment Geo Map
‍
Public Research Reports
‍
Education
Sentiment Indicators
‍
Technical Indicators
‍
Pricing
Bundle pricing
‍
FAQ
‍
Announcements
‍
COMPANY
‍
About
‍
In the News
‍
Testimonials
‍
Client Success Stories
CONTACT
‍
General Inquiries
‍
Media Inquiries
‍
Financial Professionals Inquiries
‍
© 2026 Sundial Capital Research Inc. All rights reserved.
Setsail Marketing
TermsPrivacyAffiliate Program
Risk Disclosure: The information and tools provided are for research and analytical purposes only and are not intended as investment advice. Market analysis involves uncertainty, and outcomes may differ from expectations. Users should conduct their own due diligence and consider their individual circumstances before making any financial decisions. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Hypothetical Performance Disclosure: Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading. for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all which can adversely affect trading results.

Testimonial Disclosure: Testimonials appearing on this website may not be representative of other clients or customers and is not a guarantee of future performance or success.